I was in Delhi last week and Delhi has come up very well ... the reason .... because it has its own state govt. But other metros (inspite of people living here paying huge taxes) has pathetic infrastructure ... the reason ... the rural development has to happen in their states otherwise they lose the elections for trying to develop the metro. So if all the metros has their own state govt then people living in metros will generate more tax money because of more investments and with better infrastructure. Let the 2nd tier cities become the capitals of states (like Mysore, Pune etc) and after 50 years or so from now, if they are qulaified, let them have their own state govt. If all the places come up eventually how does it matter if we have 500 states after 200 years. Hope I have a point here ...
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by Deepak on Dec 25, 2007 09:05 PM Permalink
Your analysis gives a good idea.But our shit politicians are not at all creative in finding solutions.
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by sinu reddy on Jun 08, 2008 08:18 PM Permalink
Food riots in India are not very far then. people in Metro has to Beg for Food or eat the money.Many farmers are sacrificing their lives to feed us. Govt has banned export of many food items there by reducing the price of many grains and farmers are made of commit suicide. Keep in mind that metros are built/developed from the green revolution. So urban and rural development should go hand in hand.Its like kicking out mother once wife comes in..