First he shows how you can save money over 20 years if you live on rent. Then there are series of assumptions. Then he talks about benifits of owning a house. What's the point? What's the conclusion? Do we buy or do we live on rent? This article is certainly detrimental to personalfn.com. No body wants indecisive advices !!
He wants to show that though you can save money from staying in a rented house, you should opt for buying one, because it will be more advantageous over the period.
If you don't understand what the author is trying to say, you should not comment on him.
RE:[object]
by drunken monk on Apr 30, 2007 06:23 PM Permalink
archana, so u know evertything? thats what gayathri explains that she could not come to conclusion out of the article.
