At umpteen times in the case, the author makes factual errors and typos...e.g. debt that stood at Rs 1,112 crore (Rs 11.12 billion) was brought down to Rs 3,076 crore. Absurd. This reaffirms my observation that rediff editors care two hoots about quality. Absolute crap! moreover, considering the Garuda is obviously refering to Maruti. Did you guys take No-Objection from Maruti before putting up this case?
