Hi. I read your article and it really disappointed me for two reasons. Firstly and most importantly, such an article was sneaked into Rediff under the guest column's section, so the website or the news agency is never in trouble. It's quite possible though that this can be an article from one of its own reporters. Secondly, your views or rather apparently biased views and hence shrouded with an utter lack of completeness about the knowledge of the Reservation Policy are egregiously disappointing and even more so as it is posted on the Web. By now, you would have sensed what I mean. I don't completely disagree with you but the percentage of agreement is nominal. When someone (you could well be a reporter with Rediff, who knows) gets a chance to write something which may get published and people can actually read it, it's always a good idea to write something which really makes sense and which shows you have done your research well and held the objectivity of the matter intact, which your article (or sleazy negative propaganda) overtly lacks. Just know that the degree to which the really oppressed benefit from reserv'n is far greater than that of the "injustice" to non-reserved guys.
RE:Concerned about the author's knowledge of the subject
by Gaurav on May 01, 2006 10:07 AM Permalink
Dear Someone Objective We do not understand what you are talking about- accusing Rediff of negative propoganda? Also, what is the basis of your claiming that the really backward get far more benefits compared to the injustice suffered by the non reserved? Can you show us some survey/report on the basis of which you have arrived on this conclusion. If I am not mistaken, perhaps you have also been able to enjoy the benefits of reservation, and you certainly do not appear like you are from the really oppressed sections.
