Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Re:
by Raja Bhaiyya on Jul 28, 2007 05:32 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

live-in relationships are nothing but a decoy for fulltime sex access.. these morons with their so called "western" "liberal" crrap dont know sh*t about the repercussions of their selfish deeds.
You cant emulate everything the west has to offer.. in the name of liberty and free society. If that is the case why dont u also adopt peodofilia and incest.. why u so called liberals stop their?? mayb in a few years u will practice these evils too!! All in the name of liberalisation.
The Society has a set fabric with a set rules, u break one rule the whole system collapses.. like it has done in the west..
Marriage and Family brings real peace and happiness in a society no matter how many downsides it may have.
Im sure none of my sensible friends here would agree to marry a girl who has been a mistress/keep/rakhail of some other guy.. and if anybody chooses such a partner.. then he/she must have been a keep for someone else.. so nothing to tell them.
My opinion... learn good things from the west.. be honest and sincere workers, bring productivity and puncuality, bring justice and charity in ur nature.. dont go lusting after the evils.. because they may be easy to adopt but very hard to get rid off.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Re:
by debarshi on Jul 28, 2007 06:01 PM   Permalink
i don't think live-in relation is a decoy of sex access...what is a marriage? just a ritual to stay together. we call it base of our society...can we say western culture has no base in their society...if we say so then we are living in ignorant's world...western society has their own problems...relation doesnot last long there in half of the cases...but why so? one point all parties are too free to compromise to stay together to listen to other half's wishes...but then the problem is in wrong education they got...not the concept of live-in relations...i see people stay 10-20 years without marriages...its just not needed...because to stay together you need to have trust and love for each other..if that is not there a marriage can also break in indian society...most important is to advance economically we need to get rid of certain social barriers like casteism...marriage should be left on the decisions of the individual parties..now boys and gals of indian society like to remain controlled by their parents till old ages...problem is there...they are not mentally free to make big steps...if we can be free of our mind then certain rituals cannot bind us anymore to be a first world country...though it doesnot mean that marriages need not to be there, it is an wonderful thing...but again it should e decisions of individuals not be dictated by others..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Re:
by Raja Bhaiyya on Jul 28, 2007 06:14 PM   Permalink
Deba.. u r being an ignorant here when u call marriage a ritual to stay together. Marriage and the practice of whoring(live-in) are incomparable for sure.. as highlited by anil above.. how many of u r willing to b children of non-married parents?? its easier to preach such nonsense in the garb of "liberty".
Im sure we have many more "liberal" hypocrits here who would portray themselves as "free minded" but would not practice the same or object if their siblings/children etc did any of this "modern" stuff.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Re:
by anil on Jul 28, 2007 05:57 PM   Permalink
right raja bahiyya fully agree with u

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Live-in relationships are good'