I was in Delhi last week and Delhi has come up very well ... the reason .... because it has its own state govt. But other metros (inspite odf people living here paying huge taxes) has pathetic infrastructure ... the reason ... the rural development has to happen in their states otherwise they lose the elections for trying to develop the metro. So if all the metros has their own state govt then people living in metros will get the value for the tax money. The central govt can concentrate on the development of the rural India. Hope I have a point here ...
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by amit rajnikant shah on Dec 17, 2007 11:26 AM Permalink
AAMCHI MUMBAI ZINDABAAD....no city can bit Mumbai.....
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by Ratan on Dec 17, 2007 11:25 AM Permalink
They why Delhi is a seperate state and improving like anything (from our tax money)? why don't they think of rural developoment and be part of UP???? You are a 3rd class idiot ...
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by mpc on Dec 17, 2007 12:59 PM Permalink
The reason is one and only one...the place is infested with bureaucrats and politicians...
RE:All metros in India should have their own state govt ...
by nagaraj hanumanthappa on Dec 17, 2007 05:40 PM Permalink
In south,if any wanna visualise good living status of cities,I suggest in rankings as , BANGALORE,MYSORE,KOCHI,TRIVENDRUM,KOIMOTTUR,HYDERABAD,CHENNAI...overall best city to live is MYSORE
