RE:sachin an average cricketer just playing for money
by Star on Jan 23, 2008 04:10 PM Permalink
Priyadarshan You are absulutely right being non performer he is still hanging in the team and depriving the young talents.... Shame on sachin...
RE:RE:sachin an average cricketer just playing for money
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Jan 23, 2008 04:14 PM Permalink
Yea, that's why Sachin scored more than 1200 ODI runs last year, and is the highest scorer or India in the current series with an average of 65.40
RE:sachin an average cricketer just playing for money
by Narayan Raman on Jan 23, 2008 04:09 PM Permalink
average cricketer - Sachin? you must be out of your mind. While many of us inlcuding myself have been disappointed time and again when sachin has failed to deliver when the chips are down, there is no doubting that he will always be remembered as one of the greats. He is also a better fielder than Ganguly in the outfield and has always been a better one day cricketer than Dravid and Ganguly.
RE:sachin an average cricketer just playing for money
by srikanth viji on Jan 23, 2008 04:05 PM Permalink
stupid. dont write rubbish in the public forum
RE:sachin an average cricketer just playing for money
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Jan 23, 2008 04:08 PM Permalink
Average cricketer ? Look below -
Bradman never missed a Tendulkar innings in last five years
Sir Donald Bradman was first impressed by Sachin Tendulkar while watching a one-day game against Australia in the 1996 World Cup and never missed a chance to see an innings from the Indian maestro after that, the book 'Bradman's Best' reveals.
"He was most taken in by Tendulkar's technique, compactness and his shot production and had asked his wife to have a look at the Indian as he felt that Tendulkar played like he had. Jessie agreed that they appeared similar.
"Bradman never missed a chance to see Tendulkar from then until the end of the 1999 three-match Test series in Australia," the book says.
"Bradman ranked Brian Lara and Tendulkar as the best batsmen in the world and found it difficult to judge who was better. He thought that Tendulkar had a very sound defence while Lara was marginally more aggressive and took more risks.
"By 2000, he held the view that they were the best in world cricket, but that Tendulkar just pipped Lara as the world's number one," it says.
