RE:Listen Mr. Hyden
by suresh on Jan 22, 2008 04:00 PM Permalink
Everybody talks abt symonds wicket, but Tendulkar survived a definite LBW Shout of Clarke's bowling (when he was on 45), so the difference is not much. What happened in Perth? Bad decisions in Favour of India: 1. Chris Rogers (1st innings) 2. Hussey (2nd Innings) 3 Symonds (2nd Innings) 4. Tendulkar (plumb lbw on 49, 1st innings) 5. Dravid (plumb lbw to Johnson when he was around 20s)
Bad decision in Favour of Australia
1. Tendulkar (lbw given out) (but he already got one good decision in favour of him)
So Aussies won in Sydney, because of Bucknor and Benson. India won in Perth, because of Rauf and Bowden. So it is 2-1 still.
RE:RE:RE:Listen Mr. Hyden
by suresh on Jan 22, 2008 04:16 PM Permalink
More than the Bad decision, we have to see the impact. Ponting not given didn't have much impact, but Dravid and Tendulkar got very big impact. Also 3 players given out for aussies (2 of them in 2nd innings is huge impact) since the difference is only 73.
RE:Listen Mr. Hyden
by techpraveen anil on Jan 22, 2008 05:10 PM Permalink
hey these decisions which were nt given were appeals for LBW and in such decisions there is always a element of doubt as it is done in real time and the umpire neednt be a hawkeye to judge the bounce of the ball etc... the decision which were nt in favor of indians at sydney were the ones where the nick could be heard by a deaf guy :D... well u cannot compare the two of them
RE:Listen Mr. Hyden
by Bhavik Shankar on Jan 22, 2008 12:34 PM Permalink
nethier us, nor austrlia or anyone else can change what happened in sydney. Hopefully something good comes out of it like more use of technology. History says austrlia a 2-1 up lets leave it at that and move on.
