Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by mmspm on Jan 08, 2008 09:12 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Ban Ponting & Clark on the basis of 2003 incident of aus/pak series

Ban Symonds for wrong allegation on Harbhajan

Ban both umpires Bucknor and Benson for their willian behaviour

Ban match refree proctor for not taking any fruitfull step from 1st of the series for umpires blunders and not took any step on ponting and clark regarding their catches

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by Calvin Corser on Jan 08, 2008 09:28 PM   Permalink
Ban them all I say!!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by raj on Jan 08, 2008 09:33 PM   Permalink
:) lols

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by mmspm on Jan 08, 2008 09:35 PM   Permalink
yes raj

ICC officials have Banned many players from sub-continents for silly reasons. Above said are not as silly as those reasons to Ban them

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by raj on Jan 08, 2008 09:38 PM   Permalink
im sorry, i was amused by the comment, not that i was agreeing with him. i fully know and appreciate the indian point of view. you my friend are totally un-initiated speaking with finesse to these gentlemen who know the art of arguments vry well, have good command of the language, and also probably have a few lawyers amongst them. im not a lawyer, but im pretty practical about presenting my point of view, being abusive is not a solution. i dont mind sharing a good joke with whoever it is.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by on Jan 08, 2008 09:59 PM   Permalink
Raj, we may not agree with you on every point, but you definitely have our respect. It's the Australian way - sometimes you have to agree to disagree. But I think you'd agree that we are on the same page for some issues!

But even I need to sleep, so goodnight all
Cheers
Michael

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by on Jan 08, 2008 09:37 PM   Permalink
you forgot a few:

Ban everyone who fails to walk for a decision which is given out.

Ban everyone who appeals for any decision which is given not-out.

Then I guess we will have to watch the tennis or something - there will be no-one left to play cricket.

ps I hate watching tennis.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by mmspm on Jan 08, 2008 09:49 PM   Permalink
@ michael

even in ur points also australian cricketers dancing all the way. mind it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:@ Che Rogers Here is an alternative view
by on Jan 08, 2008 10:01 PM   Permalink
Heaven forbid the Australians would celebrate equalling a world record of 16 consecutive test victories, a period of dominance, high skill and high achievement. Especially after a game filled with such high drama, stress, fatigue, and swinging emotions.

I'm thinking back to the T20 celebrations in India by way of comparison. Especially when the BCCI originally wanted to boycott T20 cricket saying it was bad for the game. How quickly that tune changed (not that this is good or bad, just interesting to note in hindsight).

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
It's about justice, not world domination