Mr Panicker, you echo my point which I have been making on Aussie blogosphere which seems like a waste of time now. ALl of Australia has judged Bhajji to be guilty and are incensed if you question that because that would mean Aussies are liars. They have no problem or see any hypocrisy when one points out that India is incensed when Bhajji is called a liar which is Procter's conclusion here.
My main point is this: instead of saying "I believed the Australians", why didn't Procter use some logic. Look at video evidence. Where was the incident ? Where were the umpires and involved players relative to it ? Is it possible that Gilchrist et al heard it and Sachin and umpires didn't because of different distances involved. No thinking along this line occurred. So its word of Aussies against Bhajji and that is no evidence for a 3 match ban.
