Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
why bajji ?
by sridhara jayateertha on Jan 06, 2008 07:32 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

We all know who is match referee %u2026..! .
Once he was let McGrath of the hook it was really punishable but he was Australian.

{This was between Saravanan and McGrath]

Once McGrath called Sanath Jayasury As black Monkey. He never punished. Is not it racial?

In 2001 in India see the footage of Slater argument with umpires then you will understand the double standards of ICC

Even every time and in every test they behave like this and umpires never complain this but now they did this, why %u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026?

But some people in India still talk in favor of Australia. I doubt their fathers may be from Australia %u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026%u2026..!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:why bajji ?
by Kris iyer on Jan 06, 2008 08:21 AM   Permalink
S. Jayateertha is right to recall past incidents in which Aussie players have said a lot of racist and vulgar things and to focus on the reactions of a) the SriLankan or Indian team at the receiving end of abuse- why did they not file complaints? and b) The toleration of umpires on all of these past occasions of the abuse they heard - Was there a different standard applied to "white" teams? In the Symonds-Bhajji case, it is said in some media that Symonds started an on-field chat, while Bhajji was focusing on his excellent batting, "Why are you such a goose today?" . Now, Indians could argue that in India it is provocative to call someone a "goose" - especially when that comes out of the blue without any previous word from Bhajji.
Could all other cricket fans, please share through this site, similar sledging / bad behaviour by the "holier-than-thou" Aussie cricket teams, of the past or of the present composition.
Yes, Sridhara I do agree with you that some Indias do have a strange mind-set of believing every white person or white team is superior and in any case, correct in their speech and conduct. This is not to say we should do the opposite, every time. We should judge issues on their merit - not on which race or religion the parties belong to.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Harbhajan likely to escape ban