Sreesanth was let off because he belongs to the influential south indian brahmin community, where as Bhajji belongs to a small minority community. This is the whole reason for severe punishment to Bhajji. His being a Sikh is his biggest crime.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by subramanian rama on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
your comments are stupid. Where does community come into this. Why do you people politicize everything. Was not Harbajan let off lightly when he made the racial comments and the whole world knows that he got away because of BCCI which is a cash rich and dominates the world cricket arem twisted the ICC . Harbajan is no saint and he should have been punished more severely may be with one year ban. Do you mean to say he was let off lightly earlier because of his community. Come on Grow up !
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Chandra CS on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
A Sardar or people who are enjoying reservations/caste difference can only think like that.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by madan menon on Apr 30, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
Sreesanth is a influential south indian brahmin? are you gone out of your mind? Check the facts before blabbering anything in the net OK? Pl do not exhibit your ignorance.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by vishal kothari on Apr 30, 2008 12:14 PM Permalink
i dont understand why guys like u brings community everytime to defend something.. dont forget our PM i from sikh commuinity only which u consider minority...first time the board has taken correct decision.. bajji required some treatment.. but also i agree that sree should havent been left apart..but i dont think that he was left coz he belongs to majority community..
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by viswanath Seshamani on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
Sree santh is Nair ( Khatria) & not a Brahmin. Get Ur factsa correct. Brahmins in Kerala are Namboodris or Palghat Iyers.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Krishnan Kutty on Apr 30, 2008 12:13 PM Permalink
Who told Sreeshanth is a Brahmin ? Dont write such rubbish things without knowing anything. Bhajji deserve (also sreeshant badly deserves this slap). When BCCI bailed out Bhajji in Australia, did you tell anything like "Bhajji is from North India so, Sharad Pawar supported him". People like you need some urgent counselling for keeping such mentality.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Mohammed Islamul on Apr 30, 2008 12:14 PM Permalink
jv please leave your email id or place where you come from... you are such a big nuts I guess..
this is against no sikhs..who are known to be brave generally and not as stupid as bhajji is...
remember the indian army has a sikh regiment and a gurkha regiment... the only ones named after a particular community...
not because sikhs are stupid or whatever... dont try to communalise a single person's act to the whole community...
having said that the braveness in PM Manmohansingh is terribly missing... especially in the case of the recent T R Balu incident...
so in all it has got nothing to do with communities... just the individual
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by bhupinder raj on Apr 30, 2008 12:18 PM Permalink
Stop this division of minority/majority. Both are players and they have committed the offence in that capacity. Don't look at every thing with a jaundice eye. Use some common sense
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by mohan mohan on Apr 30, 2008 12:11 PM Permalink
The bane of India. People making such divisive comments and wallowing in majority-minority politics and complexes. When will we ever rise above such petty thinking ?
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by bharat on Apr 30, 2008 12:09 PM Permalink
Mayawati, please read this email and see that this poor, innocent member of the minorities is honoured for his courage shown against the Brahmins!
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by B J on Apr 30, 2008 12:11 PM Permalink
What you have wrote above is utter nonsense. Pls dont assume things and blabber. There is not even 1% truth in what you have written.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Raju Pachipulusu on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
Don't make every thing under cast & religion. Even though we are educated still think in the same direction of before independence. Now, even cricket, politics, education, jobs every where cast & religion comes in to picture. I don't when our nation (people) will come out of this even after 65% literecy we report.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Vibhu Sharma on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
You remind me of Azharuddin telling that he was targetted in match fixing because he was from minority community... forgetting that there were 4 others (including Kapil, Jadeja...) and forrgetting that he was captain of India for a decade.
Where was this logic when Indian team suppored this 'minority' guy in australia? People like you are deranged and harmful for a civilized society.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by suresh kasu on Apr 30, 2008 12:31 PM Permalink
Sreesanth to my knowledge was a break dancer who performed in Boogie Woogie & an optimist who is full of life . He has intrinsic positive aggression in all fields of life & a God fearing person as mostus . He reminds me of Mahatmaji who offered his second cheek for non violence. Suresh Kasu
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by new media on Apr 30, 2008 12:38 PM Permalink
Thank God so many good people(Impartial-secular and intelligent)lives here.
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by rajendra hegde on Apr 30, 2008 12:12 PM Permalink
Sreshant is not a Brahmin. He is a nair and Brahmins are not at all influnetial even in their home because they constitute a miniscule of population. Stop this nonsense MR/MRS JV. do not writ withour knowing the things properly and make wild accusations on Brahmins who are not at all connected to this event. making bramins as their target without any reason and rhyme has become a fashion for rogues like Mr JV
RE:Sreesanth let off because
by Mohammed Islamul on Apr 30, 2008 12:10 PM Permalink
Sreesanth a brahmin??? shit what a big lie... he belongs to the nair community... sreesanth eats so much of beef, sheep and fish..... and you think he comes from brahmin community...
