Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Is Strike Rate Important in Test Matches??????????????
by Mac on Apr 05, 2008 09:38 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

According to some people strike rate is very important even in test matches, well, so if India had scored 76 all out in 10 overs instead of 20 overs India would have Won the Match, Gr8 Theory, Again blame rahul Dravid he scored 3 runs of 40 balls, tha is why India did not score 76 in 10 Overs.

The Match is now over in 3 days, btw what is the Strike rate of Kallis in this testmatch, What was the strike rate of Hashim Amla in first test match, it was not 100, it was not even 50.

If India looses blame Rahul Dravid, why????????, his strike rate is 40, which is the same as Kallis.Infact Rahul Dravid is Jacues Kallis of India, who is the Best Batsman in South African side------------ Jacques Kallis.

So who should be the best Batsman in India Side----------------- Rahul Dravid.????????????????

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Is Strike Rate Important in Test Matches??????????????
by on Apr 05, 2008 09:43 PM   Permalink
Well said... But people blame about his performance in chennai.. If he had a better strike rate at chennai may be v could have had a chance for victory...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Is Strike Rate Important in Test Matches??????????????
by keshav murthy on Apr 05, 2008 09:56 PM   Permalink
wHY INSULT rAHUL dRAVID SAYING HE IS JAQUES CALLIS OF iNDIS? iT IS LIKE CALLING CALLING KALIDASA AS sHAKESPEARE OF iNDIA. Remember Rahul is senior to kallis. if u want call Kllis as Rahul of South Africa.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/cricket/2008/apr/05india.htm