Rediff should have interviewed Dilip Vengsarkar,Chairman of Selectors instead of interviewing Mr Borde, who was selected as a stopgap arrangement. Vengsarkar was hell bent on giving captaincy to Sachin and ebverybody can clearly follow/read between the lines about what he said in his press statements regarding captaincy and Sachin.Powerful Regional Lobby and Politics is responsible for the deterioration of Indian Cricket.
RE:RE:Dravid
by Lakshmoji on Sep 17, 2007 11:54 AM Permalink
Very correct.
I was a fan of Vengy when he was in Indian team, now I hate him.
Leaving aside Drivid's issue... if I am not opening one more controversial topic... 1. Why is Agarkar played again and again? Whole world knows that he is very costly bowler. His bowling never improves with age and experience. It was Kiran More earlier and now Vengy to play him in team.
2. What is the flexibility of Ramesh Pawar? Is he a fit to today's limited overs cricket?
3. Why is Gautam Gambhir preferred a ahead of Uthappa? Is it to satisfy the North lobby because Sharad Pawar was supported by anti-Dalmia lobby from North?
If these many questions are to be answered, how can we expect the players like Dravid (who do not have any God Father) to take the decisions|
