This is called cheap journalism. To the question "/Will Team India miss ... Sachin Tendulkar/" Binny has said (read the entire interview) "/I don't think so./" and then he has gone on saying we may miss Sachin/'s batting. A fair analysis. His fielding, running between the wicket, and bowling are not suitable to 20-20 game. But the rediff reporter has twisted Binny/'s opinion and has titled the interview article thus: "/'We may miss Tendulkar at Twenty20'/". This is irresponsible journalism.
RE:Cheap tricks of journalism
by Amit on Sep 04, 2007 03:10 PM Permalink
First of all I want to say something on behalf of your comment .....see sachin is capable or not ..this is not a big matter ...but the way we all criticise him ..that's really cheap ..dont talk about jounalism ..it reflect voice of ur own society ..they say wat u love to listen ..far from fact n reality !! Sachin is ofcourse capable of playing any level of cricket either its 20-20 or 50 over limited match or five days test ...He has prooved this so many times ...but our problem is wat ..we expect more n more from him ..why dont u blame dravid for his poor batting show .below far his own set standard in past ..as a caption ..he raises lots of doubtfull decision ...turning next Azahar ????God knows ..but few has such thoughts for sure ...forget sachin ..who is capable to play 20-20 ..tell me ..ur sehwag , yuvraj , karthik , dhoni ???? except yuvraj ..none is actually on behalf of strike rate.Dhoni is technicaly worse n uncertain to score runs always .And dont forget most of other team have same those experienced players of their side .20-20 is exciting ..but there too ..u need technic n placing better than power ..powerfull strokes can be prevented by clever bowling ..if bowler has enough international level experience .
