Not only harbhajan... it applies to even tendulkar...If a player is physically unfit....not in form continuously...he has to be dropped for a while so that he can work it out and make a come back...
RE:harbhajan
by alert on Jul 30, 2007 11:17 PM Permalink
what happened to Balaji who destroyed pakistan in pakistan...they cant include based on his past glory because now he is not physically fit..same rule should have been applied for tendulkar when he was having all kind of fitness problems..
RE:harbhajan
by alert on Jul 31, 2007 07:45 AM Permalink
no u are wrong... if tendulkar and balaji are physically unfit they are 100% the same... Not an iota of difference...u cant play cricket with statistics...
RE:harbhajan
by Nilima Chatterji on Jul 31, 2007 03:43 AM Permalink
Do not worry Nandu, I have seen sachin people blaming sachin in response to article named "Rock-climbing in Newzeeland"
RE:harbhajan
by Raju Dalit on Jul 30, 2007 11:55 PM Permalink
AGREED SIR! IF THEY DONT WORK, LET THEM SIT IN THE BACK STAGE. HARBHAJAN IS YOUNG STILL, CAN COME BACK. HE HAS THE SPIRIT. A LITTLE PATIENCE WILL WORK.
RE:harbhajan
by sabteam on Jul 30, 2007 11:43 PM Permalink
u r talking abt Tendulkar fitness? this shows ur knowledge in cricket... in Bangladesh hot summer tendulkar stood whole day and made century while the other young guns karthik and jaffer cannot bale to stand and took retired hurt.. who has more fitness? dont drag sachin in every column. Sachin, Kaif, Yuvraj has good fitness in indian team and good runners between wickets.
