Prasanna, may be good spinner at his times, but the things now changed. At that time there is video clipping or Computers to study oppositions bowling. Now, with the technology is there, it is very difficult for bowlers either spinner or pace bowlers to go for variations every day. Once a batsman was out to good ball, he sees that reply 50 times to correct himself if the same ball is again bowled to him. In these circumstances also Warne, Muralitharan or Kumble taking 07 or 08 wickets per innings means it is really remarkable. How in the hell Prasanna saying that no good spinner there in the world.
RE:Good Spinners
by anirban chakraborty on Jul 10, 2007 06:58 PM Permalink
From your reply, it seems you do not know whether a cricket field is round or square. You think that cricket is played in video games. Yaar, we are not talking of video games cricket, but cricket on field.
RE:Good Spinners
by Ravi chandra on Jul 11, 2007 07:04 AM Permalink
Hey Sai. All the three are great spinners. But with Shande Warne, he has got most of his wkts against England and SA who are the worst players of spin. Shane Warne's against India is very bad. Murali has got more wkts against Bangladesh than Shane. Similarly Prasanna got his good and bad, the way cricket played now a days changed a lot, test runs are scored at an avg rate of 3.00/over, in ancient days it was less than 2/over. So we cant compare any of these greats to each other, all the three are great in their own league. So enjoy the game of cricket.
