I think this is a part of the australian strategy..remember..these matches were played without their key players...so once if they were in for the WC, i think the story would be the same again! So thrs nothing much to worry guys..and one more thing the matches australia lost wre only due to lack of their main strike bowlers...but their batting is as solid as ever..So beware of aussies my dear friends!
RE:RE:Nothing as such
by Mohd Yaqub on Feb 21, 2007 05:24 PM Permalink
Well said, these Aus-crazy indians will never digest the defeat of Aus. still trying to justify the defeat as strategy ????
RE:Nothing as such
by sagar rodrigue on Feb 20, 2007 08:30 PM Permalink
asper you who oyu do you refer as strike boeler for australia i didnt get you as Mg grath.bracken johnson etc werre ther except Lee(lucky ro escape the shame due to defeat)
RE:Nothing as such
by anuradha narasimhan on Feb 20, 2007 11:14 PM Permalink
No team will lose a series or a triseries finals as part of strategies.It is like saying USA is losing in Iraq to win in Afghanistan or Iran. If Aus was without its full bowling strength, then what about Eng which defeated Aus without Vaughan,Tresothick,Petierson,Anderson,Harmison. Aus were with their full strength batting and bolwing players.
Cricket is a great leveller and the law of averages is catching up with Aus.It is good for cricket.
RE:Nothing as such
by anuradha narasimhan on Feb 20, 2007 08:37 PM Permalink
What about the 2 matches Aus lost to Eng in the Tri-Series final.They were with their full strength batting and bowling departments.In fact Eng was without its key players like Vaughan,Tresothick,Petierson,Harmison,Anderson.Still Eng won. When are you migrating to Aus.Or you already there???
