all r expresed thought when he was not in good touch. and played 16 yr cricket.he have many injuries (plz recall from back problem when he played one of the best inning in chennai).today we rate him on the basic of todays cricketer. but he serve india when no one there. he is only match winner.think if harbhajan not there can india win at eden garden(laximan 281). if agarkar not take wicket can india make recorded win in australia(dravid 233. but people rate him one the basic of todays situation i think today we have many match winner. and dravid, laximan, yuvi are same time performing good. but when sachin performing well(1992-1999). no one to support him.then als he WIN 50 MAN OF THE MATCH award. i ask quation rate these 50 matches only with other any indian. and analise how many matches he won for india out of he played and how many other won. i think if he won 50 man of the match award mean he win minimum 50 match for india. my quation is is any one win more than this?. absulitly no then why people raising quation about him when he have going through injuries(witch part of body remain without injury?).i not telling he is special but obuasly great than people who booed him.
RE:sachin is special
by Shashank Hiwarkar on Apr 22, 2006 09:33 PM Permalink
Sachin is great not because of his records, but because of his overall personality. He is great in dealing with peers & Juniors. It's not a secreat that he has all the shots of cricket with him, which is also proved with his records. And the most important thing, after 17 yrs of international cricket, we are not getting any other person to talk about. Isn't it a sign of a great player? You are still compairing him with anybody and everybody in cricket. As indian, we should be proud of Sachin, which is making entire world proud (See Grower / Don Bradman / Shane Warne / Brian Lara / Akram etc.... everybody appreciate greatness of this little master, and we indian are talking about WHEN he should retire???)
