I do not agree with you on that Suman. If my understanding is right then Ganguly was there to play the anchor role (evident in the match against Bermuda) while other players like Sehwag and Uthappa play the shots. Similar strategy to what most successful teams use. It was unfortunate for India that they always ended up losing early wickets and 3 and 4 down didn't score much either. I suppose in retrospect Ganguly should have been allowed to play his natural game especially when he is in such good form. Having said that I would ask the question: Was it better to stay at the wicket for a while in difficult batting conditions or to get out early trying to hit like Sehwag and Uthappa did?? I am open to critcism and comments.
