I agree on many valid points, particularly about Greg's success rate in the first year. We still do not know who was responsible for the change in direction since then. Greg is a professional, so he certainly won't air his views or disagreement in public until his term ends. In my view, the Board must have the courage to back up Greg and Dravid for atleast one more year and plan the transitory phase with balanced judgment. Non-performers must be shown the door and the youth and energy welcomed. Above all, the Board must have a full time CEO, a cricket-savvy professional, who must be given the mandate to run BCCI like a corporate house accountable to the stakeholders.
