No doubt ganguly was a good captain but i dont agree that dravid is bad.. It was under him only that india won 17 matches chasing and test series again west indies etc ... so when the same team was performing we were winning under him too and it was looking so bright at that time. As far as defending 191 is concerned may be dravid missed a trick or 2 but how will you justify bhajji not picking a single wicket in 10 overs. Had we lost by 1 or 2 wickets I would have agreed that dravid failed to kill but when your 4 main bowlers are not able to get any wickets then I wonder what a captain could have done .. He might have missed a few tricks but at the asme time our bowlers and fielders also didnt made it easy for him. I hope u ll agree that bang batsmen are no special that we needed any spl captaincy for them still out bowlers cudnt make any impression on them ... again its every ones loss, skipper included.
