Cricket is 11 members game, one man cannot make impact on the game fully. for example(to imagin)in one match if India won the toss and elected to bat first and sachin made record score of 200 above and rest of all below 30s and the team score is 490, in Second session i.e. bowlers bowled worestly and fielders droped the catches and finally india lose. In this example sachin made 200 but india loss the game because of the bowlers and drop catches, And all of us (indians)make a comment of sachin score 100 india lose the game but they dont discuss about the bowling and bad fielding.So game is 11 membors. all has to contribute. even if sachin scores big and team india give big target to the oppositions if the bowlers not bowled well india will lose the game. So finally sachin contribution is 60% and others have to contibute the remaining. If sachin is born in Australia or south africa that will make lot of difference. because they have great bowlers and fielders. Cricket is two sessions play if batting session is good and bowlling session not well performed the team will lose the game even if team gives big target. All of us discussing about the batting of Sachin and comparing with the others like lara,ponting etc, but we dont discuss about the sachin bowling he taken most wanted wickets in the cricket but the great lara and ponting not bowling and not taking the wickets. so why we are comparing with the lara and ponting. Sachin is always great batsmen and bowler. He give lot of contribution to the batting side and the bowlers do best in other side. 41 hundreds are great innings out 29 we win the game and 11 game are lose because of bowlers and fielders. I am saying sachin is great allrounder than the lara and ponting.
