Case 1. Jodha Akbar movie gets opposed by public. Few state govts also ban the movie in wake of law and order problems. But, our dear Law of the land steps in to get the movie cleared and supports "creativity".
Case 2. An art exhibition is held on Aurangazeb as he was according to their own Mughal records. Again people protest. But this time, the law of the land stops the exhibition, stating that "actual history" should not be stated as it causes discomfort to "pseudo-secularists".
This is yet another example of discrimination. I do not understand, if the history can not be displayed as it happened, how else can you display it?
