1. How did you arrive at a generic and racist conclusion on "Nepalis" being cautious, etc.?
2. Do you know the layout and architecture of the house to be able to comment on whether or not the Talwars would have heard three men who obviously were trying to do whatever they were up to, quietly? Is it necessary that three men drinking beer at night need to be making a lot of noise?
3. Perhaps Aarushi did try to scream, which explains why the murderer chose to silence her.
4. Do you have access to forensics, other than through the very unreliable media reports? How can you claim forensic report states that Hemraj was murdered first or that the throat was slit after 20 minutes of death? Did you know blood splashes to a lot more than 7-8 feet, particularly when the murder weapon (whether a blunt object or a knife) is being swung?
5. Is there anything to suggest that the photographs in the camera contained anything related to the murder?
6. I understand investigating agencies do not rely on a single form of lie-detection testing to arrive at answers. In case you are familiar with the process, questions are structured to identify inconsistencies, and at least three different methods are used to map the answers that seem most consistent.
