A lie told to oneself hundred times over becomes the truth in the subconscious mind.....or so it seems as per psychologists.....at least that is my interpretation..
If Krishna had already decided as part of a plan to conceal the real truth, then it is posible that he is lying and his corroboration should not be taken as the gospel..
Here are some discrepancies : 1) If the Talwars had been at home(as claimed by them)it is impossible that 3 nepalis would have even attempted to enter Aarushi's room......Nepalis by nature are very cautious, secretive and risk averse.....
2) If as reported, they were having drinks, then Talwars would have woken up to the sound of 3 men in the house....
3) Aarushi attempted to stave of the assailants, as per Krishna's description...she would have screamed or atleast there would have been a muffled sound..how come Talwars did not hear anything??
4) As per forensics, Hemraj was murdered first and then Aarushi...however, Krishna gives an opposite view saying that aarushi was murdered first....and all the while Hemraj went along with them?? Very strange considering that Hemraj loved Aarushi like his daughter....
4) As per forensics, Aarushi was murdered by hitting her with a heavy object on the head...and that 20 minutes after her death, her throat was slit.....then how come the blood stains were found on the open door at a distance of 7/8 feet?? if a dead person's throat is slit, the blood would barely gush out....it is a sign that
