What I don’t understand is last week when Mr. Nariman filed an affidavit on behalf of the Central Govt. saying that since lord Rama himself has broken the Ramasethu bridge thrice with his arrow after coming back from Lanka, (he had cited Kamba Ramayana for this) the bridge cannot be worshipped as Hindus don’t worship broken things. But all these days these same secular Govt along with Mr. Karunanidhi was arguing that Lord Rama was fictious figure and a myth, then how the very same people have accepted that the bridge was broken by Lord Rama himself? Now, they themselves have established that the Bridge was constructed by Lord Rama. If that is the case then definitely it has some archeological value and needs to be preserved!
