Kanwaljit..you are agreeing to something that I have not said. My comment, correctly read, does not advocate abolishion of whip. It simply says that whip is relevant. Its for the individual to weigh his options. Whether s/he wants to defy the whip and pay the price for his/her defiance. I am simply justifying the constitutional provision for the whip. So when you are saying that whip should be abolished, you are disagreeing with me.
