Neeraja Chaudary tried her best to prevail upon the readers convinced of her arguments which basically support the stand of the left parties & paradoxically,also,of Somnath.Her urge for appreciation for Somnath ignores the basic fact that he could be speaker only because he happens to be an MP and his happening to be an MP is only because of his being the member of his party on whose symbol he got elected.His constitutional role should,hence,come only next to his loyalty to his party.He should first prove himself as a disciplined soldier of his party which was instrumental for his being speaker today.Somnath is known for his emotional imbalance which became a subject matter for more than once during his term as speaker till now.His contributuion to the party for the past 40 years does not give him a free handle to defy his party's discipline,which,as said by Chaudary herself is valued a lot by communists.It can also be not ruled out that, being once the candidate for presidentship to have been unobjected by Congress,he must have developed a sense of gratitude towards it in his heart of heart.After all,human passions some times, outweighs all politics & party disciplines & Chatterjee need not be an exception to this. There is nothing wrong in Karath's including his name in the list of his party's MPs withdrawing support,since while forwarding it at the time of extending the support too his name figured.In what way does it alter his primary membership of the party?
