Congress minted money during its these four years rule through corruption which reached its all time heights-especially in A.P which acts as its chief fund supplier/raiser.So,price is not a matter for it whether the "loyalty" being bought is worth or not.And to tell precisely,it is a misnomer to call the support bought as loyalty;loyalty is certainly a good term in its strict meaning.What Congress wants is a bail out from the D,Day and suffice it if it achieves it by the price paid now.This trading is not peculiar to Congress alone,but has become a common disease with all the political parties-the price,however,varying according to the purse of individual parties. Congress knows pretty well that the MPs being bought for the exclusive purpose of winning the vote of confidence may not stick long with them and will be a of nuisance value for the rest of the term.But the demand is like that and the need & affordability of the buyer is like this.So,the deal is being struck between the buyer & seller to deal with the "Deal" Congress may not be committing the same mistake as their trend setter P.V Narsimha Rao did by settling the deal in cash terms.There are hundred and odd other ways of paying the price to the seller;it need not necessarily be in the form of hard cash. As the proverb says,"money makes the mare go".Nothing is impossible for it.Congress firmly believes in the dictum"Dhana Moolam Idam Jagath".In politics,it is the king maker.
