My friend Rakesh please understand one thing. there is no proof that there was a Jesus Christ. the Bible is the writings of various other saints who lived in the present day Middle East then. All the miracles attributed to JC may have ben performed but there is no evidence that it was done by JC. Ther is no proof that there was a crucifixion. Granted that no wooden structure body, thorns etc can last for so long, but no writings, records in Roman registers etc have been discovered to substantiate the story either. No historical account of it nothing. All the stories and miracles may have been performed but not necessariy by the same man, it could have been done by various people. Likewise nailing on the cross was a common punishment those days, cruel but true, (why thieve in rome used to have their hands chopped off and hung around their shoulders while they were made to run in circles) yet there is no record to show that One MR JC of Nazareth was crucified on that day because of being against the prevalent religion of that day and he was sold by Mr J for so much money. I mean so on & so forth. That is why the Gospel of Thomas discovered in 2006 was such a scare, and conviniently pushed under the carpet by the Church. What actually happened was the influential priests an Bishops in 200AD i.e. 200 years later selectively took in writings of various saints and prepared the Bible. This is not against any religion but is scientific and was shown on discovery channel.
