Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
bad N deal
by bency mohan gopalakrishnan on Jul 09, 2008 03:19 PM

The Government has also been highlighting a temporary shortage of uranium fuel and painting it as a permanent one.
The Government, either deliberately or a failure of planning, did not invest in expanding the existing uranium mines or opening new mines. Worse, they also closed one of the existing mines. The Atomic Energy Commission has made clear that we have enough uranium for 10,000 MW of installed capacity against the current capacity of only about 4,000 MW. It appears that the spectre of uranium shortage has been created only to push a Deal that is not in India 's national interest. The India-US Nuclear Deal is not about India 's energy security. Energy security lies in using indigenous energy resources such as coal and ensuring our future energy supplies from Iran and other countries in West and Central Asia . Obviously, augmenting indigenous coal production, investing in oil exploration, securing gas supplies through Iran Gas Pipeline are much more important for India's energy security than buying imported reactors and importing uranium for such nuclear plants. Energy security does not lie in helping a moribund US nuclear industry to sell us billions of dollars of reactors, which nobody is buying in the US . Mythical energy claims are being made in order to promote a bad nuclear deal. Energy is just a cover.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
''N-deal important for both India, US''