yes,but only when it is based on correct logical argumentation.his whole argumentation is flawed, as it appears from the above article.one example is see the argument ""Once the law goes, the confessions obtained under it will also be rejected. My clients will then have to be released because there is no evidence against them," he says." Does he know that the taking of oath and confession need not to be taken from a terrorism act, relevant sections of IPC/CPC are sufficient.
