This is about reply below. The point is there was always (and it will also be the case with any blind assertion) a 50:50 probability of the PMs concerns turning out to be right or wrong. So I can not understand how questioning the logic of the PM making unconfirmed statements is indicative of stubborn and biased minds? A lot of fake astrologers make many predictions and due to the laws of probabilities some of them do indeed come true bur that in itself does not eliminate the problem of these imposters.It is always good to have an open mind rather than a closed one.
