What that research got to do with the current problem of Balochistan ( this is the right spelling according to the Balochs)??? Yes, I have certainly done more than Gandhi for India. Gandhi has not send any money from his earnings in Soth Africa, in India he used to depend on Birla and Bajaj for his living cost. I have earned my own money and send a lot during the last 20 years to India continuously. I do not depend on any Marwari busnessman to reserve a whole train so that I can travel on a third class. I do not take money from the Congress party to do airconditioning a slum so that I can spend a few days for show in a slum.
What Gandhi has done for India: 1) He had destroyed the Swaraj movement that had started in 1905 and replaced it by Khilafat Movement. 2) He had insulted the revoluttionaries when they were about to be hanged. 3) He was determined to partition India even in 1940 to share India among his two real sons, Nehru and Jinnah. 4) He has refused anti-Jinnah Muslim leaders like Fazlul Haque of Bengal, Allah Bux of Sindh, Khan Abdul Gaffer Khan of NWFP and Khan of Kalat of Balochistan. If Gandhi could not fail in his legal practice in South Africa and had stayed there India would be a lot better off. in 1919 India had a large number of very able leaders ( Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Chittaranjan Das, Bipin Pal, Surendranath Banerjee). There was no need for Gandhi, an Empire loyalist, to come to India to destroy the Freedom Movement. India is being ruled by coward
