YOU ARE YUR OWN COMPETITOR IN STUPIDITY, AND YOU MANAGE TO SURPRISE ME YET AGAIN!! answer in context here - the question is regarding the scientific ethos of islam - ehich i contend is non-existent ! you point out a commentary book which cannot be considered SEMINAL, plus i see 2 people endorsing the book and you qualify it as "endorsed by all leading science historians"
stop this hyperbolic sel-congratulations and point out to me 3 seminal contributions of islam, dare?? btw, first check the meaning of seminal , you STUPID
