contd....... opposition. One doesn't take a risk like this for petty oil contracts. It is selfish men who always without fail play safe by maintaining status quo.
WHAT'S WRONG basically in invasion/occupation? There is this "occupation" in Kashmir of which so much is being made. Do critics realize that the separatist leaders gladly accept security from Indians or that the most anti-India Kashmiri ever born, Geelani purchases a house in Delhi in 2000s? Is it not true that had IPKF set things right none of the allegations would have occurred to anybody?
Sovereignty. Firstly, it doesn't affect Iraq's sovereignty. Bush never laid claim to the territory nor does he want to rule them. Bush's intention was to be there as helpers/liberators akin to NWFP tribal entry into Azad Kashmir 1947. Secondly, to hell with fictitious notion of sovereignty. If individual-to-individual behaviour had been human Iraqis won't mind if foreigners stay in their homes for a while.
Could it be that originally common Iraqis were not averse to invasion till seconds after soldiers actually came across them? It took trademark American courage and skills to make Iraqis hate occupation. Civilians who could testify this possibility were shot in their respective first meetings with trigger-happy troops.
Violence is ingrained in average American%u2019s genes. Campus shootout/friendly-fire occurs only in that gigantic/mammoth (which is bigger?) loony bin, US nation. To give an idea of hyperactive, imag
