This person is willfully writing misleading hsitory. He or she jooly wel knows that the conflict in Sri Lanka i sbetween the native indegenous Tamils who have lived there for thousands of uear and teh Sinhala, and not between the tamiusl of recent Indian origin mainly brough in by the British around 150 years ago. Hese indentrued mostly Tamil labourers still live a poor miserable life in Tea estates and pose no threat to the Sinhalas . The Sinhalas have got them where they wanat to be permanent cooies in teh teas estaes. Inteh mid 70s and 80s they tried to bring Sinhla workers in to the teas estates but it di dnot work they were tto lazy and were not prepared to do any hard work. but wanted lots of salary. That is the reason that the Britsh brought inthese docile backward low cste Indians either form Tamil nadu or Bihar, as the Sinhlas Malays and the native Fijians were too lazy. If you really look at it the SInhalas want a frre ride on the hard work of the Tamils and the Tamli Muslims. The Malays on the hardwork or the CHinese and Indians and teh Native Finjians on the Indians. In fact over 50% of the so called present Sinhalas are opnly recent migrants form southern Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The Europena colonisation was a catostrophe for the native Tamilsin Sri Lanka. As all three kingdons were ruled by Tamil kings. The Aristocracy all spoke Tamil.The Sinhlas were receding and the Tamils were expanding. However due to the forced conversions
