Raj is a rioteer. He manipulates Gandhi, Bhagat Singh and jefferson to his advantage. gandhi fought in South Africa for Indian Minorities. Bhagat Singh never fought for sikhs against hindus (he fought against people of different countries). I request u all to just read about hitler. Hitler has stark similiarities with Raj. Hitler used evoking acerbic speeches against jews and considered them a thief of german oppurtunities. Hitler advocated viloent measures. Quite understandably, as it happened in Germany, people immediately find a messiah behing a murderoud devil. They relate him to postive change. They vote for him expecting a revolution that yields power and prosperity. But unfortunately that doesnt materialise when that egomaniac comes to power. History is ripe with examples take Hitler, khomeni and mao etc. The problem is that the illinformed general public will still support Raj till they actually realise the frankeinstien nurtured. Though the sound indian democratic institution will neutralise Raj, but its very well understandable that he will remain relevant for times to come. Perhaps till he turns 82 and some of his nephew joins the rheotric. The future history book, when the world will be a global village, will name thackerays as petty thugs who used the general public for ridiculous political gains. Till that time the choice is to either bear these idiots or understand there nefarious designs and effectively neutralise them
