The Dravidian Aryan was brought about by Max Muller. He himself later regretted and wanted to take out the theory and could not. That served the purpose of dividing India enough for popularizing Christianity, the main purpose of purring forward the theory any way. The antibrahminism is also a powerful tool to weaken Hindus. Brahmins were not just problem for Christian preachings, but a constant problem for British rule in India. The Brahmins who the majority in India were the target of Muslim rulers for the same reason. The crowing achievement of the British is to make them the target of Hindus themselves. I saw a Telugu Movie, Annamacharya, where the producer shows Brahmins burning the saitn's books. Any Brahmin burning a book never occurred in 10k history of India. Without their contributions to India, there is not much of Hindu civilization. Surprisingly, there no God who is portrayed as Brahmin. In-fact all demons including Ravana were Brahmins. These writings and depictions were preserved in various ways by Brahmins. Neither Ramayana or Mahabharata were written by Brahmins, yet Brahmins revered them. The antibrahnin DK movement amazes me. Without them, these guys would have been just tribes, let alone ministers and Governors.