For the purpose, they had sought amendment of a section of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act under which the foetus can be aborted after 20 weeks only if there was a fatal risk to the mother and not the foetus.
I feel thats good enough to aid them as well....If the Govt. wont heed its own rules,...why keep rules. I also feel HC saying no, is going to cause long term issues and this is going to become a massive topic soon enough - once things go wrong (ethically or unethically)...The state will be sued (that's possible right..or only in USA??).
As mentioned on and off in other sections of this thread/s , we cant use the term baby or child..its still a foetus...so unless you want to start saying "Dont killl Foetus" or Don't Support Foetus killing...people mentioning KILLING CHILD/BABY are out of line..Theres a difference between foetus and child..thats why its called Foetus....
I think everyone who feels the foetus termination appeal was wrong should then say DONT KILL or let mothers kill their "FOETUS" and not baby or child...
OR OPTIONALLY ask the Govt. to recgonize foetus as child or baby....
