Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:reality of Kashmir
by JonBonJovi on Apr 28, 2008 03:35 AM

it doesnt show the acts of genocide of indian army 60000 deaths were all terrorists? y 370 in kashmir? the law of partition of 1947 was "princely states will decide on teir own to either join india or pakistan according to the wishes of its people" now analyse this rule for hyderabad deccan, junagadh and kashmir
1 Hyderabad muslin ruler predominantly hindu population, favored pakistan with no territorial border,police action state annexed rightly done since people shud be with india.
2 Junagadh 99 percent hindu state with muslim ruler, favored pak, police action done, plebscite, state went to india with 99 percent favor for india
3 kashmir muslim dominated ruler hindu, people demanded pakistan and thout he will go for pakistan. signed a treaty with pakistan that he needs time. time for what? sh abdullah was in jail for many years under this raja's rule for freedom activities. no action pakistan put pressure just liek india did on nizam of hyderabad army action,raja asked for indian help nehru asked for sheikh abdllahs release,agreed amry action, war, nehru goes to UN, cease fire,1/3 with pak.2/3 with india with borders with pakistan viable than india,UN asked for plebscite,agreed by indo pak, sh abdullah made kashmiri representative coz of his allegienace to nehru a thankful note for his release and never ending fight bw indo and pak.
Now my frnds analyse even if pak did army action and all the bad things the state should be goin to pakistan since if people had been give

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/apr/27jk.htm