CONT'D: This obsession with skin colour shows in terms of this Aryan-Dravidian theory, in terms of denying something to people of "fair colour" - almost an instant anger and dislike of people with fairer complexion. Hence, this strong support for reservation. Yet, there is this deep, Freudian desire to connect with that fair skin, especially, in its female form.
There is no archaeological evidence for an "Aryan invasion". No literary references at all, in Sanskrit or in Tamil to any invasion or wars between Aryans and Dravidians. As I said, I do not know what relevance this "Aryan" theory can have after nearly 2 to 3 thousand years. Why create confusion now about something that goes back in time for that long? Are there special blood tests to prove "Aryan" and "Dravidian". If so, are you then going to say, only "Dravidians" get reservation and "Aryans" don't. That will be a nice one for the S.Ct, won't it? Arjun Singh may not like it, because he looks quite fair to me. BY Nanchil's test, he wd be an "Aryan". On this theory, the DK and DMK, have attacked Sanskrit (The Aryan language), Hinduism (the Aryan religion) and Tamil Brahmins (the Aryans of TNadu) - they are yet to pronounce on whether Islam and Christianity are also Aryan religions. The DMK would have eliminated from the state almost all brahmins in another 20 years time - it wd be an unique achievement in India. Muslims have replaced brahmins in many Tamil villages. Some of them speak Urdu, not Tamil.
