Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RAM vs Babur
by desh deepak joshi on Apr 14, 2008 03:16 PM

I will not argue wether RAM existed or not but it is unquestionable that there was temple of RAM at Ayodhya before babur was even born and for that matter even the the KABA at Mecca was temple of IDOLATERS too......so what...the matter of fact is our Hindu heritage has been mortgaged by the so called secularist....who are not man enough to say yes BABUR was an invader and so were Mahamud Ghaznavi and Mohammed Ghori.....For Indians RAM should be more important than both of the invaders (who plundered, raped and killed) unless some people can prove that BABUR or Ghaznavi or Ghori were there ancestors.....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://inwww.rediff.com/news/2008/apr/14guest.htm