My thoughts after reading this article is that it is very good faith based article in which facts (misfacts) are skewed to present the authors theory.
I am firm believer that Ram is a historical leader and personality and is GOD to my beliefs and millions of people in world, but it does not mean that I can prove his existence.
Even the literature differs which the author suggests provides contradictory views and facts. (Ayodhya in Thailand versus Ayodhya in India).
I am amused, when author suggests RAM is most historically narrated figure in literature. I believe he should also take international literature in his consideration where Christianity and Islam religious leaders will come on top and even Budhism leaders might be very near. If literature is the measure Krishna may possibly beat RAM in that subject area.
At the end I think this is good faith based narration where facts are skewed to its best.
