I totally agree with what this author has to say about the existance of Ram. His line of arguement, position and qualification only make him appear more trustable. To me, trying to find physical evidence of Ram's existance is pointless. The UPA government's arguement on the Ram sethu issue in the supreme court is not supported by concrete evidence. They should first scientifically establish that Ram and ramayanam are fictious before asking the believers in Ram to prove his existance. That my friends looks close to impossible today. In my opinion this is the work of a bunch of atheist politicians (hailing from TN and bengal). No theist has ever interferred in the beliefs of atheists and in this context we expect them not to interfere in our's either. This is a free country and we should be proud of it. Which ever court of law you go to in this world the law of the land will always uphold peoples belief in Ram as there is no evidence to prove it otherwise. At the end of the day Law is what a bunch of people calling themselves as countrymen believe in. Its not concrete and evidence based like science. So when a billion people believe in Ram i dont see a reason for any court of law going against this belief. At the end i hope good wisdom prevails.
