A bit overdone
by Kaushik Das on Apr 15, 2008 06:36 AM
Ok, I agree that there may be some evidence to the existence of Ram and it may actually be futile to search for living proof after so many years.
However, there are fallacies in your arguments.
The sun is approximately 5 bilion years old - so, life for 4.3 billiion years is quite possible. But man for 4.3 years - improbable. Unless - you mean that maanaw (from manu) was always the most advanced creature existing. So, in the times of chimpanzees, they would be man.
There is more proof for rather than against Darwin's theory. This theory has also made us realise the relations between several species. By disproving darwin's theory, you are guilty of the same crime you are accusing foreign historians of.
The scientists who are against darwin are inspired by false christian stories (many of which are copied from hindu folklore of KrsNa) and 'beliefs'. Please ask the same scientists what they think of hinduism and its greatness and whether ram existed.
