This is exactly what i am saying !!! In india the historians won't analyse Vedas, Purans etc and search for foreigner's narrations. But rest of the world they do research on stories and epics too. Otherwise Abraham is not history but a myth only. Also to understand the history of ancient India knowledge of sanskrit is essential, She had stated openly that she does'nt know sanskrit. This is the reason she is failing to understand the history of ancient India. For eg, the capital of Kosala at the time of Bimbisara the Magadhan Emperor was not Ayodhya. This proves that Ramayana predates Emperor Bimbisara mentioned in history (550 BCE) If a thorough analysis of Kalidasa and others' works are made it is almost certain that the great poet's time predates that of Gupta Emperor Chandragupta 2 and the legendary Vikramaditya of Avanti(Malwa) was not Chandragupta 2.
