Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
History and Ramayana
by Paritosh Sinha on Sep 26, 2007 01:01 PM

According Dr. Suniti Kumar Chatterjee,..Ramayana was not the historical

fact of any age; it is from beginning to end a fiction. Valmiki borrowing

from the story of Dashratha Jataka of the Buddhist literature to compose this

epic.For Ref.: Suniti Kumar Chatterjee, " Rama and his Birthplace",

Ananda Bazaar Patrika, Calcutta, Jan 17, 1976. English translation by Noorul

Islam Khan is included in the book Babri Masjid _ Ram Janambhoomi Controversy,

ed. Asghar Ali Engineer, 1990). Prof. Chatterji goes on to state that "Valmiki

in the texture of the basic story had recourse to wide imagination as he liked.

he shifted the place of occurence from Benarasi to Ayodhya....King Dashratha

was the king of Banarasi and not of Ayodhya as claimed in Ramayana." Prof.

Chatterji goes on to write :"No scholar of Indian history thinks that Rama,

the hero of Ramayana was a historical person who can be relegated to particular

period of time" ref: P.S. Sridhara Murthy: Rama-Ramayana and Babar, 1988, pp. 14

Further

Among the acquisitions of IGNCA is a monumental collection belonging to Prof. Suniti Kumar Chajjterjee (1890-1977). A multi-disciplinary scholar, polymath, philologist and connoisseur of art, he was the Professor of Linguistics and Languages at the University of Calcutta for thirty years. He was a confluence of world culture, being well versed in Sanskrit, Greek, Gothic, Avesta, Arabic, Bengali and Hindi. He was written a number of scholarly books and papers on a wi

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Nobody has proved Ram didn't exist'