One man's enemy is another man's hero! You are looking at him in the perspective of Hindutva where as being a secular Indian, we look at him as a fundamentalist who should be hanged under law before its too late. He was the one who enraged one of the societies by raging Bombay riots which in turn brought blasts! What more proof do you want that we cannot generate peace with voilence, ahinsa with hinsa? He is a pure fundamentalist who venomous views hurts the sentiments of others and for sure he cannot survive an election without it. Tell me, for whose gain he is doing it? What good he has done for Mumbai or for that matter India then creating problems and showing extremes nerves of goondaism? Give me one good reason if why he should be spared for such an outrageous remarks?
